With
the now seemingly consistent deluge of harassment, assault, and rape
allegations dominating the news cycle, and the subsequent attention fleetingly
paid to the tireless activists who have fought to bring awareness and solutions
to these issues, it would be willfully foolish to deny the influence any given
depiction of rape has in our cultural conversation: pop, personal, or
political. Rape, assault and trauma are established pins of all that we
consume: literature, art, television. The tropes du jour often use sexual
violence as shorthand for the trial-by-fire background story necessary to
convincingly build a Strong Character (we see this often in science fiction,
fantasy, but it is equally pervasive, albeit quieter, in fiction of most genres).
Of course, the most extreme version of this is the Rape/Revenge trope, a
holdover from 1970s exploitation films, that has resurfaced in surprising, more
complicated ways. Game of Thrones, Jessica Jones, and Mad Max: Fury Road, are successful examples, to name only a recent
few. Whether these depictions
occasionally hit the mark of a realistic trauma survivor experience is
decidedly beside the point: survivor characters’ rapes often become their
entirety.
When
past experiences of sexual trauma are used as passive expository blurbs to fill
a half-flat character’s background, they can read as insincere or gimmicky. To
remedy this, pop culture has swung massively in an opposing direction that
demands rape be depicted as both heinously violent, committed only by the
criminally depraved, and that survivors be wrecked so essentially, to their
very core, that they are oftentimes incapacitated by fear or infatuated with
vengeance. These are, of course, the extreme examples, but they overshadow the
thoughtful, nuanced depictions of fully rendered survivor characters in our
zeitgeist.
And,
here is where the writer’s dilemma lies. Rape is real; it is pervasive, so this
demands that portrayals of assault and harassment be purposeful, intentional. But,
depicting it as an exhausting demon with the power to coerce a character’s
every action, inflicted by soulless predators, does a disservice to both our
characters and the cultural conversation at large. Rape is not a metaphor for
other kinds of violence – not global warming, not thought policing, not
genocide – it is a violence of its own. Rape is not the stand-in for an
interesting background story, like a summer spent campaigning for a third-party
candidate or being raised on a farm. So, when we mean to engage with sexual
assault as a plot device or a character’s background, we are not simply adding
texture to a form ‘victim’ or ‘survivor’ archetype. We are building a character
that has a full life both before and
after their assault. These bodies and places and conflicts might be
creations all our own, but choosing to engage with sexual assault means that we
must consider the real bodies, the people, that are implicated by our words. We
owe them nuanced, researched depictions.
Caitlyn GD is a second year Fiction candidate at FAU. Her
work has appeared in SmokeLong Quarterly,
Voicemail Poems, and Potluck Magazine, among others. She
currently lives in South Florida with her loving partner and two indifferent
cats. She wants you to know that Die Hard 3 is the best Die Hard.
No comments:
Post a Comment