That’s the
saying, right? I’m appropriating it for this blog not because I don’t think I
can write. I can—or I think I can—at least people tell me I can and I write
well enough to get into an MFA program, so I will go ahead and say I can.
Writing is
the reason I am here. It is the reason I signed up for the Jo Ann Beard
workshop, and all the other workshops that leave me in the bipolar throes of
accomplished elation or self-deprecating defeat. But there is another reason I
decided to get an MFA—to teach. This, however, I’m still unsure I can do…at
least well.
Taking the
Jo Ann Beard workshop seemed like a no brainer—she’s accomplished and brilliant
and everything a writer aspires to be—and I assumed the one-week intensive
would be invaluable to my writing. What I didn’t expect, however, was that is
also proved to be invaluable to my teaching. I am, for lack of a better word,
unorthodox in my pedagogical sensibilities (eye-roll all you’d like). I think
that the tools and tricks for writing well are not exclusive for creative
writing, or academic writing. Let me explain:
On the
third day of workshop, Jo Ann Beard told us about “The Sentence Test.” She says
there are four questions we should ask ourselves to know if a sentence is good.
(1) Is it grammatical? (2) Is it true? (3) Is it new information? And (4) Is
there a surprise in it?—by surprise, she explains, she means was it
interesting, did it DO something unexpected. We tried the sentence test out on
Christian Wiman’s essay “The Limit” by closing our eyes and randomly putting our
finger somewhere on the page, and then reading it aloud and deciding if it fit
the criteria to pass.
The
Sentence Test—it seems so simple, so obvious that—as writers—we should want all
our sentences to be doing something, to have weight and purpose and be worthy
of all the sentences around it. But what made me keep thinking about it long
after the workshop was over was that maybe it wasn’t obvious to those who don’t
identify as writers.
I decided
to test my theory, and scrawled the four questions on the board in my College
Composition class later that week. I asked them to try it out on the papers I
handed back, now covered in my comments with lines crossed out and the word “rep.” written over and over again (ironically). I asked my students to point
to a sentence on their papers, read it out loud, and see if it passed—needless
to say, many of them didn’t.
I explained
to them the importance of a good sentence. How much work it should do, the
importance of clarity and finding the right word (is it grammatical?). How to
state a strong opinion and support it (is it true?). How to avoid repeating
yourself to meet a word count because it weakens the argument and instead to
give more evidence (is it new information?) And how to find your voice, create
and use fresh ideas, or find new ways to be engaging to keep the reader
interested (is there a surprise in it?).
The Jo Ann
Beard workshop helped me jumpstart my writing and gave me tools to hone my
craft as a writer. But it also helped me hone my new craft—this strange and
often stressful craft of teaching. And perhaps in some indirect way I think it
also helped my students’ craft as well (I hope). So whether or not I “make it”
and one day become accomplished and brilliant and everything an aspiring writer
wants to be (God willing)—whether I CAN do that, well, is yet to be determined.
But if I can’t—and I hope I can—but if I can’t, maybe I can teach.
Nico Cassanetti is a Second Year MFA student. She originally
hails from the greatest city on earth and likes to ride bikes and leave cakes
out in the rain.
No comments:
Post a Comment